Anyone have any source for kechuala being a term for lizardfolk? Don't see it in any of my sourcebooks or dragon articles from 3.5e or 4e.
BKrueg (talk) 03:36, February 14, 2019 (UTC)
Timeline Overhaul[]
Hi folks, just thinking an overhaul of this article is overdue? I intend to go through and source what I can, highlight any contradictions Out of Setting in the appendix, but otherwise stick mainly to canon sources.
I do intend to mention bits of the timeline as introduced in Exploring Eberron, but recognise the Kanon source? If I am stepping on any toes please alert me herein. Edits will be various (accidentally saved the last one without saying what was changed), and citations will be as page-accurate as I can get them!
Thanks y'all!
- By all means, you're welcome to give it a shot! It's one of those things that's definitely needed, but more of an undertaking than people usually have time for. It's a big job, so take care that it doesn't become an overwhelming one for you.
- If you retain the current format and break the entries down by year, then I suggest making them section headings, for example,
===972 YK===. That way, I can make links like 972 YK redirect to these entries.
- The other approach is to make separate pages for each year, as was done on the Forgotten Realms Wiki, e.g., 972 DR. The Eberron Wiki has some pages like this started, 994 YK, 996 YK, and 998 YK, which would be more useful for the very detailed last hundred years. However, that requires a lot of template code and development, so it's more of a long-term project, not something to worry about at this stage.
- If you have any questions or issues, just let me know. ~ BadCatMan (talk) 13:19, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks very much! I've been looking into templating, but it will take me some time between everything else; I figure might as well aim for a good final product than a quick hotfix.
- I am thinking that a timeline could be established as separate pages for the modern era certainly, but previous ages could be confined to this page. I will continue to think of an appealing solution without using too broad of a brush! ~ Randolfolo (talk) 07:54, 17 April 2023 (GMT)