FANDOM

A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • Hi Shikenkanbaby,

    I am a new editor, and I hope to contribute a lot to this project in the future.

    I am hoping to propose a change in policy for how non-canon material utilizes Categories. I think it is fine that this wiki hosts non-canon, user-generated material, but I think there should be a clear delineation between canon and non-canon material in the categories for ease of use. Obviously there are few ways to do this, so here are some options along these lines:

    Option 1: Limit user-generated material to only use the "Player Character" and "Player Campaign" categories. Pros: Simple. Cons: It becomes much harder to find material.

    Option 2: Create non-canon subcategories for each category. So we might have a "Category:Druids (Non-canon)" for characters who are non-canon. Pros: Navigation is much easier. Cons: It would take a lot of work to maintain it, and it would effectively double the number of categories.

    Option 3: Create a small handful of non-canon categories. Pros: A middle-ground between Option 1 and 2. Cons: Navigation still is not perfect.

    Do any of these sound feasible? I would love to hear your thoughts on this.

      Loading editor
    • Hi, sorry I missed this message until now. I think option 1 is best, we don't have the man power for anything high maintenance, it's pretty much me you and a couple others who edit very rarely. I think option 1 works best as it'll clear up the categories that are being filled with user generated material. Personally I like to make it very clear which articles are user generated. Hope that helped.  

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Just wanted to let you know that I'm not gone, but November-December are busy months for me. ^^ I'll definitely be doing more edits again after the holidays.

      Loading editor
    • Thanks for letting me know! I'll look forward to hearing from you again next year,  good luck, Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year Unahim! 

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • In 3.5, Changelings and Doppelgangers are distinct creatures, but in 4th they're one and the same. Should we change all references to "doppelgangers" coming from 4th edition sources to "changelings"? That way it will mean the same regardless of your edition. Right now it gives 3.5 players the impression that actual doppelgangers are in a lot of places, when really it's mostly "just" changelings.

      Loading editor
  • This page: http://eberron.wikia.com/wiki/The_ir'Igthorn_Family  seems to be homebrew, right? It's linked directly into the official droaam power groups, so I'm unsure, but it seems that way. What should I do with it?

      Loading editor
    • Yeah it's unofficial, I'd remove it from the Droaam article. Thanks for consulting me first. 

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Just totally stole the 5th Rogue's Luck badge from you. Your streak is at an end!

      Loading editor
  • I'm soon to start a campaign with Eberron as setting.  What is bothering me is that there is no material for 5th edition rules, 5th having recenty come out.  I really would like to see Eberron supported and soon.  I've started  a petition.  Thoughts?

      Loading editor
    • View all 5 replies
    • They already have the book completed. I homebrew with an official Encounters DM and he has a physical copy of it. We've just started into the campaign and just finished our first large scale battle while aboard an airship. Pretty damn cool stuff. I can't wait for it to be officially released!

        Loading editor
    • 174.65.132.204 wrote:
      They already have the book completed. I homebrew with an official Encounters DM and he has a physical copy of it. We've just started into the campaign and just finished our first large scale battle while aboard an airship. Pretty damn cool stuff. I can't wait for it to be officially released!

      I don't know if I can trust you ha ha, I hope you're right though. Looking forward to some 5e style art of Eberron!


        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hi, I got your message over on my D&D4 Wiki talk page. I'd be happy to help. Could you tell me a little more about the layout you want for this wiki's main page?

      Loading editor
    • Hi,

      I'm not entirely sure as to what I want because I don't know what can be done with html so if there's anything you see that you think you can improve then please do so. The only idea I did have was a simplified version of the top part of the d&d4 wiki, just four square pictures that link to the pictured race/class' page.

      Races: Changeling, Kalashtar, Warforged

      Class: Artificer. 

      Thank you. 

        Loading editor
    • How embarrassing, I forgot that shifters are also an original Eberron race too. If you could include them as well that'd be super, thank you. 

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hi, welcome to Eberron Wiki! Thanks for your edit to the File:Inquisi.png page. If you need help, read through our help pages or contact a local admin. If there are no active admins here, stop by Community Central and check out our forums.

    Looking for live help? Then join us for an upcoming webinar to chat with staff and other Wikia editors. You can also check our Staff blog to keep up-to-date with the latest news and events around Wikia. Lastly, check out the Wikia Video Library, where you can find premium licensed videos to add to the wiki.

    All of these links are a great way to start exploring Wikia.


    Happy editing!

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message